<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live and live and live.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.theyearofcoffee.com/2007/04/13/live-and-live-and-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.theyearofcoffee.com/2007/04/13/live-and-live-and-live/</link>
	<description>Ceci n'est pas une blogues de café.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:09:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.theyearofcoffee.com/2007/04/13/live-and-live-and-live/comment-page-1/#comment-82673</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theyearofcoffee.com/2007/04/13/live-and-live-and-live/#comment-82673</guid>
		<description>The balance between completeness and timeliness will keep things interesting. Twitter on one end, the New York Times on the other. Obviously the first information out of a crisis isn&#039;t always going to be correct.  Then again, the New York Times ain&#039;t exactly infallible.

Case in point?  Mike got his video up first, &#039;cause I got overambitious and tried to upload a 130MB, 17 minute clip... which, of course, YouTube choked on only after a long, long, upload attempt.  Gah.  At least Google Video allows more than 100MB or 10 minutes, and a larger frame size:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4502606569188610270&amp;hl=en</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The balance between completeness and timeliness will keep things interesting. Twitter on one end, the New York Times on the other. Obviously the first information out of a crisis isn&#8217;t always going to be correct.  Then again, the New York Times ain&#8217;t exactly infallible.</p>
<p>Case in point?  Mike got his video up first, &#8217;cause I got overambitious and tried to upload a 130MB, 17 minute clip&#8230; which, of course, YouTube choked on only after a long, long, upload attempt.  Gah.  At least Google Video allows more than 100MB or 10 minutes, and a larger frame size:</p>
<p><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4502606569188610270&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4502606569188610270&amp;hl=en</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
